Claudia, aged 67, is diabetic. She developed diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy in both eyes.
She was seen by a consultant in April 1998. He recommended surgery, namely vitrectomy, membrane peeling and surgical enlargement of the posterior capsulotomy with a view to improving her vision.
The notes stated that “efforts will be made to expedite the surgery.”
Claudia was seen again in March 1999, by which time she was noted to have a shallow retinal detachment and her vision had declined from 6/24 to 6/60. She attended further clinics in July and December 1999. The surgery was not performed until 30 March 2000, almost exactly 2 years after being put on the list.
Post-operatively Claudia was advised that she would need regular reviews. These did not happen. Appointments were cancelled on the 12 April, 5 July, 12 July and 25 October 2000.
Eventually, Claudia was seen on 18th March 2001. By this time she had no perception of light vision in the left eye with a total retinal detachment. The condition of the left eye was inoperable. She was left effectively blind in that eye.
We successfully contended that there was negligence on the part of the hospital for the delay in performing surgery and the lack of post-operative follow-up.
The expert ophthalmic surgeons disagreed, however, on the level of vision Claudia would have had but for the breach of duty.
The defendant’s expert evidence was that but for the negligence Claudia would have had 6/24 vision. Our own expert was of the view that Claudia could have expected to achieve 6/18 binocular vision with competent care.
In January 2006 we received an offer to settle Claudia’s claim in the sum of £33,592.84
The trial was listed to commence on 21 June 2006.
In May 2006 Samantha Critchley settled the claim in the sum of £91,407.16 so that Claudia would receive £90,000.00 after deductions for recoverable welfare benefits.
After the case Claudia’s daughter said:-
"I just wanted to thank you for all your hard work on my mothers case. We are very pleased with the outcome.
"Although no amount of money can really compensate for her eyesight, hopefully it will enable her to make her life more comfortable. It took a while to get an outcome but you really showed your dedication in getting a decent settlement.
"Thank you again. My mother has not stopped singing your praises”
- 020 7861 4263
- email firstname.lastname@example.org
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Charities we support
Personal injury team celebrates social hub for amputees and their families
Fieldfisher hosted the first informal central London meeting hub organised for amputees and their families in association with the Limbless Association (LA)
Further criticism of sub-standard care at Basildon Hospital following death of new-born
At the inquest into the death of a baby boy at Basildon Hospital last year, the coroner concluded that serious failings by staff contributed to the baby's death at one day old.
Jane Weakley welcomes CYRIL technology to test new-borns at risk of cerebral palsy
Researchers at University College London (UCL) have developed a non-invasive monitoring system, small enough to take into neonatal intensive care units, which shines infrared light into new-born babies' brains to detect possible brain damage within a few hours of birth.
Claire Horton comments on Countess of Chester hospital nurse arrest
Claire Horton comments on the distressing case of Lucy Letby, the nurse accused of murdering and attempting to murder babies and infants in the neo-natal unit of the Countess of Chester hospital between 2015 and 2016.
Simple scan to identify breech babies supported by partner Jane Weakley and senior midwife Charlene Francois
Proposals for coroners to investigate late-term stillbirths would provide relief to grieving families