On 11 December 2001, the Court of Appeal gave its decision in Fairchild and five other related cases. The consequences of these decisions have been widely reported. Mesothelioma claimants who have been exposed to asbestos dust by more than one defendant are unlikely to succeed in their claims as a result of those decisions. The House of Lords will hear the appeals in two of the related cases, Fox v Spousal (Midland) Limited and Matthews v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1978) Limited, on 22 April 2002.
FFW partner Rodney Nelson-Jones has accepted an invitation to join the legal team representing the appellants. He is concentrating on the public policy and foreign law aspects of the cases in conjunction with Sir Sydney Kentridge QC.
The current position following Fairchild is that claimants suffering from mesothelioma who have been exposed to asbestos dust from more than one source, and particularly if they have been exposed by roughly similar amounts from each source, will not succeed in a claim against any of those defendants. This is because the Court of Appeal found that the claimants in that type of case could not prove, on the balance of probabilities, the source of the fibre or fibres that initiated the development of the tumour and could therefore not identify the “guilty” source. The fact that the defendants had admitted breaches of duty and negligence causing the claimants to be exposed to “substantial quantities” of asbestos dust made no difference.
This decision does not directly apply to asbestosis or other asbestos pleural disease claims.
Update: see Decision of House of Lords
You can discuss your mesothelioma compensation claim with any member of our mesothelioma claims team by calling freephone 0800 358 3848, email email@example.com or complete our short enquiry form.
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Charities we support
Bussey decision comes too late for carpenter exposed to asbestos in 1960s London
Our most recent settlement in the case of Alan Kaszubowski sadly highlights how important the Bussey judgement was.
Asbestos rulings provide glimmer of hope for cancer sufferers
Employers can no longer hide behind a statistic that claimed to show a ‘safe’ level of exposure, which could pave the way for a wave of compensation claims, writes Peter Williams for The Times Brief.
Claimant lawyers hail landmark asbestos risk ruling
Caroline Pinfold's landmark case of Bussey vs Anglia Heating Ltd. was featured in the Law Society Gazette
Court of Appeal offers compensation hope to victims of asbestos poisoning
A landmark ruling that could pave the way for compensation for thousands of people suffering from cancer caused by asbestos.