Following our successful appeal in our case of Bussey, where appeal court judges overruled the standard by which 'safe' levels of exposure to asbestos have historically been used to deny compensation to people exposed to asbestos at work, our most recent settlement in the case of Alan Kaszubowski sadly highlights how important that judgement was.
Mr Kaszubowski was exposed to asbestos working first as an apprentice, then a qualified carpenter in the late 1960s, early 1970s for a company called YJL London Ltd. Alan's job was to hand saw hundreds of asbestos sheets used for insulating runs of pipework in building work at Borough Polytechnic, south London.
These sheets were pre-cut to size in a 'tunnel' area on site by teams of carpenters, including Mr Kaszubowski, who remembers working whole eight-hour shifts sawing the sheets for three or four days at a time. He remembers working without masks or aspirators and with no dust extraction equipment, meaning the workers were surrounded by thick dust in the air.
Having been diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2016 aged 68, Mr Kaszubowski brought a claim against his former employers, who refused to admit breach of duty on the basis that Alan's exposure to asbestos fell below the threshold set out in the 1960s. In the meantime, Alan, becoming increasingly ill, had to go through long days of chemotherapy to attempt to halt the cancer.
In our appeal on behalf of David Bussey, we argued that defendants should not be allowed to use this threshold to deny liability, and the judges agreed.
Tragically, however, this decision came after the defendants in Mr Kaszubowski's case were able to drag out the case, arguing Mr Kaszubowski's exposure was 'not particularly hazardous', citing standards published by the Ministry of Labour in 1966 and 1968. Mr Kaszubowski died without receiving the compensation to which he was entitled.
The eventual settlement will now benefit Mr Kaszubowski 's family but it is extremely painful to them that the case was not settled during his lifetime because of the defendant's refusal to admit liability.
The Bussey decision should ensure that other families in similar situations do not experience such delays, compensation, but we are well aware that is small comfort for Alan's family.
- You can speak to our mesothelioma solicitors on freephone 0800 358 3848
- e-Mail them at email@example.com
- Complete the short enquiry form
All enquiries are completely free of charge and they will investigate all funding options for you including no win, no fee.
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Charities we support
Teamwork uncovers vital information in Marley tiles asbestos case
Following settlement in a drawn-out case against UK tile manufacturer Marley, Peter Williams said the case would have been finalised sooner had Marley acknowledged that most of its tiles used by his client Roy Morris contained asbestos.
MOD issues asbestos warning to engineers working on Sea King helicopters
According to press reports this week, the Ministry of Defence has issued a warning to Royal Navy and RAF maintenance personnel who worked on Sea King helicopters that they may have come into contact with asbestos.
Sarah Wolf comments on worrying reports regarding asbestos use in the USA
The Fieldfisher mesothelioma team is closely monitoring the furore that has broken out in the US following reports that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paved the way for the use of new products containing asbestos.
The legacy of asbestos
Asbestos mining and manufacturing companies in Wittenoom, Western Australia have left a lasting legacy of the dangers of asbestos.
Peter Williams reacts to multi-billion dollar judgement against Johnson & Johnson in talc claims
American pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson was last week ordered to pay $4.69 billion to 22 women who have suffered ovarian cancer allegedly as a result of using talcum powder contaminated with asbestos.