Mark Bowman was instructed by David in connection with a claim against a leading Harley St oncologist following a misdiagnosis of recurrent rectal cancer in February 2010. In 2008 David had initially been treated for rectal cancer at The London Clinic. He made a good recovery, but in early 2010 repeat scans were suggestive of a tumour recurrence. David was seen by the oncologist that had previously treated him in 2008, who diagnosed David as suffering from a recurrence of his rectal cancer. Repeat chemotherapy, including use of the drug Bevacizumab, was commenced in February 2010, and continued until the end of April 2010.
At the beginning of May 2010, David was admitted to The London Clinic acutely unwell, where he required extensive surgery to his pelvis and bottom. He was diagnosed with suffering from a significant rectal infection. He was not suffering from, and had not been suffering from, a recurrence of his rectal cancer.
Due to the severity of the infection, which had been made worse by the delay in treating it, by administering chemotherapy, which weakened his immune system, and by prescribing Bevacizumab, which has a known side effect of gastrointestinal perforation and exacerbating any fistula, David required multiple surgeries, and remained in hospital until September 2010.
David required major resection to his right buttock and has been left with permanent bilateral foot drop due to the nerve damaged sustained during the life saving surgery which was required due to the delay in diagnosing the infection. David has also been left with a permanent stoma and extensive unsightly scarring. David requires specialist aids and equipment to help him in his daily life, adapted rental accommodation which is suitable for him due to his disabilities, and care to assist him with many daily tasks.
David instructed Mark Bowman to investigate a claim on his behalf. It was alleged that the diagnosis of recurrent cancer was negligent. In particular, during the period February to April 2010, it was alleged that the oncologist failed to discuss David's case in the context of a multidisciplinary team meeting, failed to acknowledge that David's blood test results, which included abnormal neutrophil counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) (both of which are indicative of infection), and failed to organise further tests to confirm the diagnosis prior to commencing chemotherapy, involving the use of the drug bevacizumab.
The Defendant admitted that David did not have recurrent cancer and that it was negligent to prescribe bevacizumab, given David's previous medical history. All other allegations were denied, and it was specifically denied that David was left with a permanent stoma as a result of the alleged or admitted negligent treatment.
The trial in David's case was listed for April 2015, but in December 2014, following negotiations with the solicitors for the Defendant, the claim settled for the sum of £200,000. This sum would compensate David for his pain and suffering, for his past expenses, and the expenses he will be likely to incur in the future.
At the end of the case, David said "Thank you Mark for all the time and effort you put into my case on my behalf. I really do not think I could have asked for more."
"This was an unusual case, as usually we see cases where there have been a delay in diagnosing cancer, as opposed to incorrectly misdiagnosing someone with cancer .The Defendant raised some unusual arguments, including that there was no need for a multidisciplinary team meeting in David's case, as he was in the private sector, and therefore that NHS standards did not apply. Ultimately the award of compensation represents a good outcome and I wish David all the best for the future."
All enquiries are completely free of charge and we will investigate all funding options for you including no win, no fee.
For further information or if you would like to make a claim for medical negligence:
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Charities we support
ABC v St George's
In a trial widely reported in the media as likely to impact the law governing doctor/patient confidentiality, Jonathan Zimmern explains his case representing ABC.
Lindsay Holt highlights Swedish study implicating dangers of prolonged pregnancy
In a horribly tragic irony, a Swedish study on managing healthy pregnancies beyond the usual 40-week term was cancelled after only a quarter of the target number of expectant mothers had been surveyed due to five stillbirths and one early death of the babies of women allowed to continue into the 43rd week of pregnancy.
Failure to react to fetal heart monitoring biggest contributor to brain damage in babies
A very concerning report published by NHS Resolution this month highlights that the inability of staff to respond to CTG monitoring during a mother's labour is the most common reason behind cases where babies are born brain damaged
Dushal Mehta discusses the inquest of geneticist Maria Bitner-Glindzciz killed cycling in London
The coroner presiding over the inquest of Professor Bitner-Glindzciz this August heard evidence from witnesses to the accident, from the police and from the taxi driver who fatally injured the mother of two after she fell into his path in September 2018.
Simple scan to identify breech babies supported by partner Jane Weakley and senior midwife Charlene Francois