At birth, Bill had a low blood glucose level which fell to zero in the hours after birth. Notwithstanding this, Bill was not admitted to the Special Care Baby Unit for correction of the blood glucose level until about 10am the following morning.
Subsequently, Bill's mother contended that Bill suffered fits (and subsequent brain damage) due to neonatal hypoglycaemia on day one and day two.
Sadly, Bill went on to suffer very severe spastic quadric cerebral palsy. We argued on Bill’s behalf that the midwives and the paediatricians had been negligent in failing to recognise the low blood sugar and in failing to admit and treat Bill in the Neonatal Special Care Unit.
Although Bill’s physical injuries were consistent with a pattern of damage caused by hypoglycaemia, an MRI scan performed some years after birth, showed another potential cause of the damage, i.e. PVL. There is medical controversy as to the cause of PVL and the defendants strongly contested that such damage could not be caused by hypoglycaemia.
The injuries to Bill are so severe and his needs are great, the claim is potentially worth a very substantial amount of compensation.
On 3 December, the case went to trial and lasted for 12 days.
A number of highly qualified neonatologists, paediatricians and neuroradiologists gave crucial evidence to the Court.
In giving judgment for the defendant His honour Judge Mitchell stated that:
"...if the causal link between hypoglycaemia and PVL is proved a decade in the future then [Bill] may well have suffered an injustice. However, as I have been at pains to identify, there are a series of missing links in the causal chain which have led me to the conclusions which I have reached…"
- You can speak to our medical negligence lawyers on freephone 0800 358 3848
- email us: email@example.com
- Complete the short online enquiry form
All enquiries are completely free of charge and we will investigate all funding options for you including no win, no fee.
Sign up to our email digest