We pursued an orthopaedic negligence claim for Lara after her surgeon caused permanent damage during spinal fusion surgery. Previous solicitors had said that Lara's claim would be unsuccessful so she asked us for a second opinion. We settled the claim for almost £600,000.
In July 1995, Lara, then aged 31, sustained a three column dislocation of her cervical spine following a fall, whilst on a bouncy castle at a neighbour’s party.
Lara was initially taken to Basildon Hospital and later to the Essex Spine Centre under the care of Mr Gardner, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon. Although Mr Gardner recognised the fracture was unstable, he directed the removal of traction and the application of a plastic collar.
A few days later three nurses were moving Lara when her neck dislocated again. Mr Gardner advised spinal fusion surgery was necessary. At this time, Lara had full use of her limbs, but was suffering from tingling in her upper limbs.
Mr Gardner did not obtain an MRI scan of the cervical spine before the spinal fusion surgery. Lara was transferred to the operating table and positioned with just a plastic collar on. Her neck was not in traction during the operation.
Mr Gardner adopted a posterior approach to the surgery, partially reducing the dislocation before passing wires through C5 and C6 of the spinal process. He tightened the wires before reducing the dislocation.
In the recovery ward, Lara couldn't move her legs. She was returned to theatre where the wound was reopened and the wires removed. Post operatively, a significant degree of neurological deficit persisted.
Lara was subsequently transferred to the Spinal Injuries Unit at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital in Stanmore for rehabilitation.
Lara was left with permanent neurological deficit involving the loss of fine movement in her hands, pain in her upper limbs and neck, muscle spasm, poor balance and reduced sensation in all her limbs. These injuries were attributable to the spinal cord damage sustained during the surgery rather than the initial dislocation.
Lara's claim was initially conducted by other solicitors who issued proceedings in July 1998. Those solicitors advised her not to continue.
She then approached us for a second opinion. After speedy investigations we advised that there was a case on the following grounds:
- a lack of spinal traction whilst Lara was at the Spine Centre
- a failure to undertake an MRI scan pre-operatively, which would have revealed the presence of an anterior disc prolapse, which would have caused Mr Gardner to adopt an anterior, rather than a posterior surgical technique. This would have led to a full recovery with no neurological deficit.
Mr Gardner and the hospital were the defendants in the spinal negligence claim. The defendants strongly denied liability up until exchange of expert evidence. Soon after this, the defendants made an admission of negligence.
Valuation of the claim was complicated as Lara has been in the early stages of a career as a commodities broker. Her employers had dismissed her following her injuries. Lara had also started a family and had two children since the accident.
The claim settled shortly before trial for £550,000 plus payment by the defendant of Social Security benefits of over £26,000. The claim was funded by legal expenses insurance.
All enquiries are completely free of charge and we will investigate all funding options for you including no win, no fee. Or:
- You can speak to any member of our Medical Negligence team on freephone 0800 358 3848
- e-Mail us at firstname.lastname@example.org or,
- Complete our short enquiry form.
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
Fieldfisher is: ‘a firm full of the highest quality lawyers in the field' and has an 'outstanding depth of expertise’ - Legal 500 2015, Awarded Top Tier
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher's Personal Injury and Medical Negligence solicitors are proudly listed as 'Super Lawyers' in both on-line and off-line printed publishings.
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Fieldfisher are signatories of the Ethical Marketing Charter demonstrating our commitment to responsible, transparent and professional marketing.
Fieldfisher has been named as the winners of the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2015: *Claimant Clinical Negligence Award*. Testament to our expertise.
The psychology behind admitting a fatal mistake
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine believe that better training in the social psychology behind how we're affected by making mistakes can help doctors to be more open when things go wrong.
Fundamental errors in midwives training risks the lives of more babies
The Times reported yesterday that during the inquest of baby Billy Wilson, who died at three-days old, the midwife in charge of Billy's mother, Carla, at Pinderfields Hospital in Wakefield did not know how to use the CTG machine.
Christina Gardiner highlights worrying similarities in baby death investigations
The number of baby deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital draws worrying parallels with one of our own cases regarding substandard medical care provided at Watford General Hospital.
Surgeon Ian Paterson's case proves private hospitals need proper regulation
Following the conviction last month of rogue surgeon Ian Paterson, the Royal College of Surgeons has rightly called for a review of the way private hospitals are regulated.
The Sun reports on Keith Barrett's case of Richard Giles, who died after being electrocuted when his lorry hit 11,000 volt cables