We pursued a gynaecology negligence claim for Nina following an unwanted hysterectomy. Nina will not be able to have any more children. Mark Bowman, senior associate in the medical negligence department recovered £80,000 compensation from King George Hospital, London within a year of starting the claim.
Nina fell pregnant in early 2009 and was was given a due date of 21 September. Her pregnancy was uncomplicated and on 25 September, four days overdue, Nina referred herself to the King George Hospital in London. She was discharged home but attended again later in the day after feeling an increase in her contractions.
Nina was given an epidural and remained in labour until approximately midnight, by which time she was fully dilated but her baby's head was not advancing. Attempts were made to deliver the baby by Ventouse (suction) but these were unsuccessful. Nina was advised that a Caesarean Section was necessary.
Nina's bladder was cut during the Caesarean Section and she suffered massive blood loss. As a result of this injury Nina's uterus would not contract despite the administration of syntocinon (a drug used to stimulate the uterus and aid contractions). Nina gave birth to a healthy baby girl.
A Bakri balloon was inserted to try to manage the blood loss but there was a severe delay in obtaining blood from the blood bank with some bags being lost within the hospital. Nina continued to lose more and more blood, and within 90 minutes of giving birth had lost over 3 litres of blood.
Over the course of the next few hours Nina was not reviewed sufficiently and continued to lose further blood. Nina was eventually admitted to to ITU (intensive treatment unit), five hours after giving birth. She was very pale, agitated, very cold and with a heart rate of over 150 beats per minute but no pulse in her neck, arms and legs. She was still bleeding from her vagina.
Because of her continual bleeding, Nina was transferred to the operating theatre and a postpartum hysterectomy was performed. The operation took three hours. After the operation, Nina was transferred back to the ITU and she spent a further ten days in hospital before being discharged.
Nina had been unable to see her baby daughter for the first three days of her life, and was only able to see her for ten minutes per day whilst in ITU. For the first two months following her discharge, Nina was unable to care for her baby due to her injuries. She was practically unable to walk or lift.
Nina started to suffer vivid flashbacks to her time in hospital and her relationship with her partner was put under huge stress. They had previously planned on having at least two children but because of her hysterectomy she will not be able to have any more children.
Mark Bowman was instructed to pursue a case for gynaecology negligence against the hospital for the injuries that Nina suffered during the birth of her baby girl. Mark obtained expert evidence on the care that Nina received from a consultant anaesthetist and a consultant obstetrician. We also obtained reports of Nina's current condition, both mentally and physically, and the risk of future problems from a consultant psychiatrist and consultant obstetrician.
We notified the hospital of our intention to pursue a potential claim. The hospital agreed to enter into settlement negotiations. Following these negotiations, the hospital made an offer of £80,000 which Nina accepted.
Mark acted on a no win no fee basis and Nina will receive the full £80,000 awarded as the hospital have agreed to pay Nina's legal costs.
At the conclusion of the case Mark Bowman said:
"£80,000 represents a very good settlement based on the expert evidence obtained. This was a complex case and the expert evidence suggested that it was very much "touch and go" as to whether or not it would succeed.
"In spite of that, the defendants, relying on the contents of their own internal investigation report, wished to obtain a prompt settlement, and given that this was in all parties best interests, this was achieved."
After the claim was settled Nina said:
“We are both very grateful to Mark and very happy with the way that we were looked after and kept informed throughout the case. We can’t thank Mark enough”
For further information or if you have an obstetrics or gynaecology negligence compensation claim, call Mark Bowman on 020 7861 4043 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
- You can speak to any member of our Medical Negligence team on freephone 0800 358 3848
- e-Mail us at email@example.com or,
- Complete our short enquiry form.
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
Fieldfisher is: ‘a firm full of the highest quality lawyers in the field' and has an 'outstanding depth of expertise’ - Legal 500 2015, Awarded Top Tier
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher's Personal Injury and Medical Negligence solicitors are proudly listed as 'Super Lawyers' in both on-line and off-line printed publishings.
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Fieldfisher are signatories of the Ethical Marketing Charter demonstrating our commitment to responsible, transparent and professional marketing.
Fieldfisher has been named as the winners of the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2015: *Claimant Clinical Negligence Award*. Testament to our expertise.
The psychology behind admitting a fatal mistake
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine believe that better training in the social psychology behind how we're affected by making mistakes can help doctors to be more open when things go wrong.
Fundamental errors in midwives training risks the lives of more babies
The Times reported yesterday that during the inquest of baby Billy Wilson, who died at three-days old, the midwife in charge of Billy's mother, Carla, at Pinderfields Hospital in Wakefield did not know how to use the CTG machine.
Christina Gardiner highlights worrying similarities in baby death investigations
The number of baby deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital draws worrying parallels with one of our own cases regarding substandard medical care provided at Watford General Hospital.
Surgeon Ian Paterson's case proves private hospitals need proper regulation
Following the conviction last month of rogue surgeon Ian Paterson, the Royal College of Surgeons has rightly called for a review of the way private hospitals are regulated.
The Sun reports on Keith Barrett's case of Richard Giles, who died after being electrocuted when his lorry hit 11,000 volt cables