Claudia, aged 67, is diabetic. She developed diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy in both eyes.
She was seen by a consultant in April 1998. He recommended surgery, namely vitrectomy, membrane peeling and surgical enlargement of the posterior capsulotomy with a view to improving her vision.
The notes stated that “efforts will be made to expedite the surgery.”
Claudia was seen again in March 1999, by which time she was noted to have a shallow retinal detachment and her vision had declined from 6/24 to 6/60. She attended further clinics in July and December 1999. The surgery was not performed until 30 March 2000, almost exactly 2 years after being put on the list.
Post-operatively Claudia was advised that she would need regular reviews. These did not happen. Appointments were cancelled on the 12 April, 5 July, 12 July and 25 October 2000.
Eventually, Claudia was seen on 18th March 2001. By this time she had no perception of light vision in the left eye with a total retinal detachment. The condition of the left eye was inoperable. She was left effectively blind in that eye.
We successfully contended that there was negligence on the part of the hospital for the delay in performing surgery and the lack of post-operative follow-up.
The expert ophthalmic surgeons disagreed, however, on the level of vision Claudia would have had but for the breach of duty.
The defendant’s expert evidence was that but for the negligence Claudia would have had 6/24 vision. Our own expert was of the view that Claudia could have expected to achieve 6/18 binocular vision with competent care.
In January 2006 we received an offer to settle Claudia’s claim in the sum of £33,592.84
The trial was listed to commence on 21 June 2006.
In May 2006 Samantha Critchley settled the claim in the sum of £91,407.16 so that Claudia would receive £90,000.00 after deductions for recoverable welfare benefits.
After the case Claudia’s daughter said:-
"I just wanted to thank you for all your hard work on my mothers case. We are very pleased with the outcome.
"Although no amount of money can really compensate for her eyesight, hopefully it will enable her to make her life more comfortable. It took a while to get an outcome but you really showed your dedication in getting a decent settlement.
"Thank you again. My mother has not stopped singing your praises”
- 020 7861 4263
- email firstname.lastname@example.org, or
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
Fieldfisher is: ‘a firm full of the highest quality lawyers in the field' and has an 'outstanding depth of expertise’ - Legal 500 2015, Awarded Top Tier
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher's Personal Injury and Medical Negligence solicitors are proudly listed as 'Super Lawyers' in both on-line and off-line printed publishings.
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Fieldfisher are signatories of the Ethical Marketing Charter demonstrating our commitment to responsible, transparent and professional marketing.
Fieldfisher has been named as the winners of the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2015: *Claimant Clinical Negligence Award*. Testament to our expertise.
The psychology behind admitting a fatal mistake
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine believe that better training in the social psychology behind how we're affected by making mistakes can help doctors to be more open when things go wrong.
Fundamental errors in midwives training risks the lives of more babies
The Times reported yesterday that during the inquest of baby Billy Wilson, who died at three-days old, the midwife in charge of Billy's mother, Carla, at Pinderfields Hospital in Wakefield did not know how to use the CTG machine.
Christina Gardiner highlights worrying similarities in baby death investigations
The number of baby deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital draws worrying parallels with one of our own cases regarding substandard medical care provided at Watford General Hospital.
Surgeon Ian Paterson's case proves private hospitals need proper regulation
Following the conviction last month of rogue surgeon Ian Paterson, the Royal College of Surgeons has rightly called for a review of the way private hospitals are regulated.
The Sun reports on Keith Barrett's case of Richard Giles, who died after being electrocuted when his lorry hit 11,000 volt cables