Mark Bowman was instructed by Rose, with the benefit of legal expenses insurance, in connection with a claim for compensation arising out of surgery to her neck that took place in January 2007.
In July 2006, Rose noticed a small lump on the right side of her neck. Six months later, the lump still remained and Rose attended her GP who referred her to an ENT Surgeon.
Rose was examined by the ENT Surgeon who felt that the swelling was likely to be a lymph node, but requested an ultrasound scan so as to see whether it was a nodule in either the sub-mandibular or parotid gland.
Rose was referred to a radiologist, who performed an ultrasound scan on 04 January 2007. The radiologist reported that the scan revealed a lesion of 3cm diameter in the sub-mandibular gland. A biopsy was also performed which revealed a pleomorphic salivary adenoma.
Rose was referred back to the ENT Surgeon, who, though the tumour was almost certainly benign, recommended an operation to remove the tumour.
Surgery was performed by the ENT Surgeon on 23 January 2007, during which he excised the right sub-mandibular gland. Rose returned to see the surgeon one week later, and he was alarmed to note that the initial lump still remained.
The surgeon re-examined Rose and on palpating the lump felt that it was most likely to be within the parotid gland and not the sub-mandibular gland. He arranged for a repeat ultrasound scan which confirmed his suspicion.
As a result, Rose required a second operation on 06 March 2007 at which point the tumour was removed from her parotid gland.
As a result of the above, Rose required an extra surgical procedure, and was left with a much more prominent scar towards the front of her neck, as a result of the first procedure.
Expert opinion was sought from both a consultant ENT surgeon and a consultant radiologist, both of whom felt that the radiologist had been negligent in miss-reporting the initial ultrasound scan.
A Letter of Claim was therefore served on the radiologist, who however sought to blame the ENT Surgeon, alleging that he should have realised the lump was not in the sub-mandibular gland, and therefore not performed the first operation.
A Letter of Claim was served on the ENT Surgeon, who unsurprisingly sought to blame the radiologist for her error in reporting the ultrasound scan.
Following discussions with both Defendants, the radiologist's representatives made an offer to settle the claim in the sum of £5,000. Following discussions between the parties, and the instruction of a plastic surgeon, to provide an opinion as to whether Rose could undergo any form of corrective surgery to reduce her scarring, the claim settled in the sum of £13,209. Rose did not pay any legal fees and received this sum in full.
At the conclusion of her claim, Rose said
"I wanted to thank you for your kindness and your patience. You treated me with a lot of respect and sensitivity and explained every step clearly and thoughtfully. In fact, I think, due to the way you handled my claim, the process I had dreaded was actually quite cathartic."
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
Fieldfisher is: ‘a firm full of the highest quality lawyers in the field' and has an 'outstanding depth of expertise’ - Legal 500 2015, Awarded Top Tier
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher's Personal Injury and Medical Negligence solicitors are proudly listed as 'Super Lawyers' in both on-line and off-line printed publishings.
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Fieldfisher are signatories of the Ethical Marketing Charter demonstrating our commitment to responsible, transparent and professional marketing.
Fieldfisher has been named as the winners of the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2015: *Claimant Clinical Negligence Award*. Testament to our expertise.
The psychology behind admitting a fatal mistake
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine believe that better training in the social psychology behind how we're affected by making mistakes can help doctors to be more open when things go wrong.
Fundamental errors in midwives training risks the lives of more babies
The Times reported yesterday that during the inquest of baby Billy Wilson, who died at three-days old, the midwife in charge of Billy's mother, Carla, at Pinderfields Hospital in Wakefield did not know how to use the CTG machine.
Christina Gardiner highlights worrying similarities in baby death investigations
The number of baby deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital draws worrying parallels with one of our own cases regarding substandard medical care provided at Watford General Hospital.
Surgeon Ian Paterson's case proves private hospitals need proper regulation
Following the conviction last month of rogue surgeon Ian Paterson, the Royal College of Surgeons has rightly called for a review of the way private hospitals are regulated.
The Sun reports on Keith Barrett's case of Richard Giles, who died after being electrocuted when his lorry hit 11,000 volt cables