15 month delay in diagnosis of anal cancer
Arti Shah was instructed by AB to pursue a claim against the Royal London Hospital in relation to a 14 month delay in diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma following which she had to undergo chemo-radiotherapy.
AB had undergone an examination under anaesthetic (EUA) and biopsies identified grade 3 anal intra-epithelial neoplasia (AIN), an abnormality of skin cells which are a risk factor for anal cancer. She was referred to the care of the colorectal team at the Royal London Hospital.
Following examination, it was decided she should be kept under surveillance. She had 6 monthly follow up appointments. In early 2011 she was advised that repeat biopsies needed to be performed to exclude any changes to the cells from the previous year. A pre-operative assessment was carried out, but the procedure itself was cancelled.
AB eventually underwent an EUA with biopsies in June 2011 which was negligently performed. A series of 8-12 biopsies should have been taken and sent for histo-pathological examination. If this had been done, it would have identified an extensive area of abnormal cells in the anal canal requiring treatment.
Instead, she remained under review and further investigations were not performed.
By mid-2012, AB had significant concerns. In October 2012 she sought a second opinion from a colorectal surgeon on a private basis. He immediately performed a rectal examination which identified a suspicious lesion. She was referred for an urgent EUA and histology confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. She subsequently underwent 5.5 weeks of chemo-radiotherapy.
We sent a detailed letter of claim after obtaining independent expert evidence from a colorectal surgeon. We alleged that the biopsies taken in June 2011 had been performed negligently. If the correct number had been taken, they would have identified abnormal cells. On the balance of probabilities, treatment in June 2011 would have either prevented the cancer in 2012 or would have led to further biopsies which would have prevented/identified the cancer in 2012. It took a second opinion, which the Claimant obtained on a private basis at her own cost, before she was diagnosed and provided with suitable treatment.
The Defendant admitted that there had been a delay in diagnosis of over 1 year, which had caused AB unnecessary pain and suffering.
Settlement negotiations were entered into, and the case settled before proceedings had to be issued.
At the end of the case, AB's daughter commented:
"I would like to thank you for your support, commitment and professionalism, and for keeping me informed and taking the time to explain the process of the legal proceedings and for a successful completion. I would definitely recommend Arti to family and friends."
- You can speak to any member of our Medical Negligence team on freephone 0800 358 3848
- e-Mail us at firstname.lastname@example.org or,
- Complete our short enquiry form.
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
Fieldfisher is: ‘a firm full of the highest quality lawyers in the field' and has an 'outstanding depth of expertise’ - Legal 500 2015, Awarded Top Tier
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher's Personal Injury and Medical Negligence solicitors are proudly listed as 'Super Lawyers' in both on-line and off-line printed publishings.
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Fieldfisher are signatories of the Ethical Marketing Charter demonstrating our commitment to responsible, transparent and professional marketing.
Fieldfisher has been named as the winners of the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2015: *Claimant Clinical Negligence Award*. Testament to our expertise.
The psychology behind admitting a fatal mistake
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine believe that better training in the social psychology behind how we're affected by making mistakes can help doctors to be more open when things go wrong.
Fundamental errors in midwives training risks the lives of more babies
The Times reported yesterday that during the inquest of baby Billy Wilson, who died at three-days old, the midwife in charge of Billy's mother, Carla, at Pinderfields Hospital in Wakefield did not know how to use the CTG machine.
Christina Gardiner highlights worrying similarities in baby death investigations
The number of baby deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital draws worrying parallels with one of our own cases regarding substandard medical care provided at Watford General Hospital.
Surgeon Ian Paterson's case proves private hospitals need proper regulation
Following the conviction last month of rogue surgeon Ian Paterson, the Royal College of Surgeons has rightly called for a review of the way private hospitals are regulated.
The Sun reports on Keith Barrett's case of Richard Giles, who died after being electrocuted when his lorry hit 11,000 volt cables