Mark Bowman was instructed by the parents of A in a medical negligence claim due to the circumstances of his birth at the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital in January 2007. As a result of the circumstances of his birth A suffers from severe disabilities, in particular brain damage due to oxygen deprivation around the time of his birth which has resulted in him suffering from cerebral palsy.

 

Pregnant Woman

 

A's mother suffered from recurrent high blood pressure throughout her pregnancy. Late in the evening of the day prior to delivery she noticed reduced fetal movements. Despite telephone re-assurance to the contrary, she attended hospital the following morning. A CTG trace which measures a baby's heart rate and a mother's contractions, was started once she arrived in hospital and was immediately very concerning as it revealed very little variability and no accelerations. Despite arriving at hospital at 10:50, baby A was not born, via Caesarean Section until 13:28. He required resuscitation and a heartbeat was not established for 5 minutes.

Expert evidence was obtained from experts in the fields of midwifery and obstetrics. The advice from the first obstetric expert instructed was negative but a second expert was instructed who was supportive of a claim. It was felt that whilst the hospital had to ensure that A's mother's blood pressure was stable prior to delivery being achieved, it was alleged on A's behalf that there were unacceptable delays in delivering him, and that delivery should have been achieved by around 12:20, a saving of just over an hour. Further expert evidence was obtained from an expert neuroradiologist, who reviewed the MRI scans of A's head and confirmed that it was his opinion that the damage to A was sustained at some point prior to and close to his delivery.

It was therefore necessary to prove when the damage to A was sustained and experts in the fields of neonatology and paediatric neurology were instructed. Two negative reports were received from separate paediatric neurologists before a third expert, along with the neonatologist instructed, agreed that had A been born at or around 12:20 he would have had a much better outcome, potentially avoiding all, if not a substantial amount of the damage that was sustained.

After spending over 7 years in investigating the case and finding experts that were able to support the claim, Court proceedings were issued in February 2015. Liability was strenuously denied by the hospital who throughout the claim denied that there was a delay in A's delivery, and even if he had been delivered earlier, A would have ended up with the same injuries.  They argued that the damage to his brain had commenced in the period prior to his mother's admission to hospital, and in particular from before she noticed reduced fetal movements. Whilst the hospital admitted that the damaging event would have continued until A was resuscitated, they claimed that any damage that took place following admission to hospital  was inconsequential.

Expert reports were exchanged with the hospital and following expert meetings a settlement meeting took place in October 2016, at which a 50/50 split on liability was agreed. The terms of the agreement were approved at an infant approval hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice in November 2016. An interim payment of £200,000 has now been awarded to A and his claim will now be quantified with assistance from a number of experts and a case manager to ensure that he receives the best possible treatment.

 

Following the settlement being approved by the Court, A's parents commented:

“Mark Bowman and his team have been brilliant and worked tirelessly on our son’s case. Mark explained every step and his attention to detail is excellent. At all times we felt as though we had the best team possible fighting for our son and supporting us. We knew this would be a long and complex process during which no stone was left unturned. Whilst nothing can change what has happened securing our son’s future means we can finally focus our attention on being parents first and foremost . Our heartfelt thanks go to Mark Bowman, Lizanne Gumbel and Henry Witcomb.”

 

About Mark.

Mark BowmanMark joined the award winning Fieldfisher Personal Injury and Medical Negligence team as a trainee in 2003 and was promoted to Partner in 2013.  He successfully pursues personal injury claims and medical negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families. 

His medical negligence practice is wide ranging and includes birth injury, surgical negligence and delayed diagnosis amongst others.  His personal injury speciality is catastrophic injury cases and in particular road traffic accidents, cycle accident claims and accidents at work. Mark has recently secured the right to anonymity for Claimants who are protected parties or children in personal injury or medical negligence cases, in the landmark Court of Appeal case of JxMx.

 

Contact Mark

If you or your loved one has suffered a personal injury, accident at work or a substandard level of care and would like to talk about making a claim, call Mark Bowman on:

  • T: 020 7861 4043, or
  • E: mark.bowman@fieldfisher.com

Alternatively

  1. You can speak to any member of the Fieldfisher Personal Injury and Medical Negligence team on Freephone 0800 358 3848 or,
  2. e-Mail them at personalinjury@fieldfisher.com or,
  3. Complete their short enquiry form.

All enquiries are completely free of charge and they will investigate all funding options for you including legal aid and no win, no fee

Activity stream