On 22 October 2012 the Court approved a £1.25 million settlement in what was a hotly fought case. Samantha Critchley acted for J in the surgery negligence claim against the Whittington Hospital which settled less than two weeks before trial.
After developing appendicitis, J’s appendix was removed in October 2006. Her recovery was complicated by an infection and obstruction of the small bowel. A decision was taken to re-operate in November 2006. The purpose of the operation was explorative with a view to fashioning a stoma. Instead, of creating a stoma the surgeon performed complex surgery which involved removal of part of the bowel and two further incisions to different parts of the bowel, where there had been narrowing. The combined effect of the three procedures was to create three suture lines in the small bowel. In addition the surgeon inadvertently damaged the bowel during the operation which resulted in faecal material escaping into the abdominal cavity. These factors created a high risk that one or more of the suture lines would break down due to the hostile environment in which they were placed.
Post operatively the bowel sutures did break down and J became septic. The sepsis caused her to suffer a critical illness, hypotension, multi-organ failure and acid in the blood. In January 2007 J suffered a stroke which left her with brain damage, which effects her attention, memory, visual perception and verbal function. J also suffers from right hemiparesis which severely restricts the function of her right upper limb and her mobility and she suffers with a pain syndrome. As a result of her injuries J also became depressed. She is at risk of developing post-traumatic epilepsy.
At the time of the alleged negligence J was 37 years old. As a result of her injuries her employment was terminated and her former home was clearly unsuitable for her special needs. J has a close relationship with her sister and stepfather and they have provided her with the most devoted care.
Samantha advanced the claim alleging that the risk factors made it negligent for the surgeon to carry out the operation that he did and that a temporary ileostomy should have been fashioned; if this had been done the breakdown of the wound would not have happened and J would have avoided her injuries. The Defendant strongly denied the claim and said the surgeon’s actions would be supported by a responsible body of medical opinion. The Defendant also argued that carrying out an ileostomy would not have avoided the complications J suffered.
The settlement agreement value reflected our assessment of the risks of the case. The award will enable J to move closer to her sister, in accommodation suitable to meet her needs and will provide J with additional care and support from a specialist brain injury care and case manager
After the case was concluded, J’s sister said:
"Our case was very complex and emotionally draining. Samantha Critchley andFieldfisherproved to be our saving grace. There were never any false promises, we were always kept informed and Sam proved time and time again that she was experienced, skilful, compassionate, understanding and always the consummate professional. Everything was clearly explained with sound advice. Sam’s detailed knowledge base resulted in a substantial settlement that will change my sister’s life and provide her with future care. We cannot thank Sam enough for making a catastrophic event bearable."
Contact us on freephone 0800 358 3848
Or start your claim online.
Fieldfisher is: ‘a firm full of the highest quality lawyers in the field' and has an 'outstanding depth of expertise’ - Legal 500 2015, Awarded Top Tier
"The group is praised for its commitment to 'demystifying the legal process' while this is a firm for which the client has always been a priority"
Fieldfisher's Personal Injury and Medical Negligence solicitors are proudly listed as 'Super Lawyers' in both on-line and off-line printed publishings.
Fieldfisher has successfully been recognised as an "Occupation and Asbestos Disease Specialists" Fieldfisher are now recognised as assessors
Fieldfisher are signatories of the Ethical Marketing Charter demonstrating our commitment to responsible, transparent and professional marketing.
Fieldfisher has been named as the winners of the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2015: *Claimant Clinical Negligence Award*. Testament to our expertise.
The psychology behind admitting a fatal mistake
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine believe that better training in the social psychology behind how we're affected by making mistakes can help doctors to be more open when things go wrong.
Fundamental errors in midwives training risks the lives of more babies
The Times reported yesterday that during the inquest of baby Billy Wilson, who died at three-days old, the midwife in charge of Billy's mother, Carla, at Pinderfields Hospital in Wakefield did not know how to use the CTG machine.
Christina Gardiner highlights worrying similarities in baby death investigations
The number of baby deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital draws worrying parallels with one of our own cases regarding substandard medical care provided at Watford General Hospital.
Surgeon Ian Paterson's case proves private hospitals need proper regulation
Following the conviction last month of rogue surgeon Ian Paterson, the Royal College of Surgeons has rightly called for a review of the way private hospitals are regulated.
The Sun reports on Keith Barrett's case of Richard Giles, who died after being electrocuted when his lorry hit 11,000 volt cables